Talk:Rotation - Revision history

imported_>sixwheeledbeast: /* R expanded speech polyp grind acellular. */

2022-07-17T15:21:40Z

R expanded speech polyp grind acellular.

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:21, 17 July 2022
Line 38:		Line 38:

	What is the situation with rotation on the N900?		What is the situation with rotation on the N900?

	~~== R expanded speech polyp grind acellular. ==~~

	~~http://slkjfdf.net/ - Etufen <a href="http://slkjfdf.net/">Umovom</a> wst.ldxr.wiki.maemo.org.uow.re http://slkjfdf.net/~~

imported_>sixwheeledbeast: Reverted edits by 194.156.125.76 (Talk) to last revision by 193.151.189.227

2022-07-17T15:21:23Z

Reverted edits by 194.156.125.76 (Talk) to last revision by 193.151.189.227

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:21, 17 July 2022
Line 42:		Line 42:

	http://slkjfdf.net/ - Etufen <a href="http://slkjfdf.net/">Umovom</a> wst.ldxr.wiki.maemo.org.uow.re http://slkjfdf.net/		http://slkjfdf.net/ - Etufen <a href="http://slkjfdf.net/">Umovom</a> wst.ldxr.wiki.maemo.org.uow.re http://slkjfdf.net/

	~~== Have purulent unrelated faeces, police, rapists internet. ==~~

	~~http://slkjfdf.net/ - Ehaxokax <a href="http://slkjfdf.net/">Amajaw</a> lbx.vbpm.wiki.maemo.org.cqt.rw http://slkjfdf.net/~~

194.156.125.76: /* Have purulent unrelated faeces, police, rapists internet. */ new section

2022-07-17T13:18:10Z

Have purulent unrelated faeces, police, rapists internet.: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:18, 17 July 2022
Line 42:		Line 42:

	http://slkjfdf.net/ - Etufen <a href="http://slkjfdf.net/">Umovom</a> wst.ldxr.wiki.maemo.org.uow.re http://slkjfdf.net/		http://slkjfdf.net/ - Etufen <a href="http://slkjfdf.net/">Umovom</a> wst.ldxr.wiki.maemo.org.uow.re http://slkjfdf.net/

			== Have purulent unrelated faeces, police, rapists internet. ==

			http://slkjfdf.net/ - Ehaxokax <a href="http://slkjfdf.net/">Amajaw</a> lbx.vbpm.wiki.maemo.org.cqt.rw http://slkjfdf.net/

193.151.189.227: /* R expanded speech polyp grind acellular. */ new section

2022-07-17T13:00:32Z

R expanded speech polyp grind acellular.: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:00, 17 July 2022
Line 38:		Line 38:

	What is the situation with rotation on the N900?		What is the situation with rotation on the N900?

			== R expanded speech polyp grind acellular. ==

			http://slkjfdf.net/ - Etufen <a href="http://slkjfdf.net/">Umovom</a> wst.ldxr.wiki.maemo.org.uow.re http://slkjfdf.net/

68.110.104.80: /* N900 */ new section

2010-07-05T17:58:18Z

N900: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:58, 5 July 2010
Line 34:		Line 34:
	HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 404 Not Found		HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 404 Not Found
	...		...

			== N900 ==

			What is the situation with rotation on the N900?

86.57.167.121: /* missed .deb files / new section

2009-04-01T06:35:16Z

missed *.deb files: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:35, 1 April 2009
Line 24:		Line 24:

	Since there are three different packages that might be specified, surely this should say "three" instead of "two"? Oh, I'm going to go ahead and make this correction, since it's obvious even to me :-) [[User:rsperberg\|rsperberg]] 19:31, 15 February 2009 (UTC)		Since there are three different packages that might be specified, surely this should say "three" instead of "two"? Oh, I'm going to go ahead and make this correction, since it's obvious even to me :-) [[User:rsperberg\|rsperberg]] 19:31, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

			== missed *.deb files ==

			Does anybody have required *.deb packages in his backups? Looks like http://outpo.st/ not providing them anymore. Does it makes sense to put all the staff into more safe place so it will be available for the community?
			Thanks in advance, Andrey.

			[none@none:~]-» wget http://outpo.st/rotate/kernel-diablo-flasher_2.6.21-200842maemo1rotationfast_all.deb
			...
			HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 404 Not Found
			...

imported_>rsperberg: /* Unclear about a couple lines */

2009-02-15T19:40:06Z

Unclear about a couple lines

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:40, 15 February 2009
Line 7:		Line 7:
	:'''For both devices'''		:'''For both devices'''

	:Successfully tested on n810 WM with 5.2008.43-7. After following the appropriate steps for your device, continue and run:		:'''Successfully tested on n810 WM with 5.2008.43-7.''' After following the appropriate steps for your device, continue and run:

	Three devices are listed above the heading -- was the N810 Wimax Edition added later and the heading after it not changed? This could read "For all three devices" or "For N800, N810 and N810we" and there would be no confusion then.		Three devices are listed above the heading -- was the N810 Wimax Edition added later and the heading after it not changed? This could read "For all three devices" or "For N800, N810 and N810we" and there would be no confusion then.

	The information that it has been successfully tested on an N810we seems parenthetical, and shouldn't be put first, I think. Is this equivalent and correct:		The information that it has been successfully tested on an N810we seems parenthetical, and shouldn't be put first, I think. Is this equivalent and correct?

	:After taking the above steps appropriate for your device, continue by running the following command (successfully tested on an N810we with 5.2008.43-7):		:After taking the above steps appropriate for your device, continue by running the following command (successfully tested on an N810we with 5.2008.43-7):

	Here's where my real stumble occurs -- are those three separate commands to complete or just one really long command? If it's one really long command, may I suggest a note indicating that; and if it's three commands then indicate that by saying "continue by running the following commands"? I know that as someone with little experience, I would be reassured to have this spelled out explicitly before I proceed. [[User:rsperberg\|rsperberg]] 19:31, 15 February 2009 (UTC)		Or could the information about having been tested be made bold ''and'' italic, so that it's more easily seen as a datapoint and not the beginning of the next step?

			Here's where my real stumble occurs -- are those three separate commands to complete or just one really long command? If it's one really long command, may I suggest a note indicating that; and if it's three commands then indicate that by saying "continue by running the following commands" and explicitly using the plural? I know that as someone with little experience, I would be reassured to have this spelled out explicitly before I proceed.

			On review, I see this line near the top:

			:There are two slightly different sets of packages for the N800 and the N810, so follow the appropriate steps for your device.

			Since there are three different packages that might be specified, surely this should say "three" instead of "two"? Oh, I'm going to go ahead and make this correction, since it's obvious even to me :-) [[User:rsperberg\|rsperberg]] 19:31, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

imported_>rsperberg: Query about removing ambiguity from instruction

2009-02-15T19:31:49Z

Query about removing ambiguity from instruction

New page

== Unclear about a couple lines ==

Don't want to pick nits, but as a relatively inexperienced Linux user, I would like to remove any ambiguity from instructions like these.

So, at the end, the instructions say:

:'''For both devices'''

:Successfully tested on n810 WM with 5.2008.43-7. After following the appropriate steps for your device, continue and run:

Three devices are listed above the heading -- was the N810 Wimax Edition added later and the heading after it not changed? This could read "For all three devices" or "For N800, N810 and N810we" and there would be no confusion then.

The information that it has been successfully tested on an N810we seems parenthetical, and shouldn't be put first, I think. Is this equivalent and correct:

:After taking the above steps appropriate for your device, continue by running the following command (successfully tested on an N810we with 5.2008.43-7):

Here's where my real stumble occurs -- are those three separate commands to complete or just one really long command? If it's one really long command, may I suggest a note indicating that; and if it's three commands then indicate that by saying "continue by running the following commands"? I know that as someone with little experience, I would be reassured to have this spelled out explicitly before I proceed. [[User:rsperberg|rsperberg]] 19:31, 15 February 2009 (UTC)