File:Edg msexchange config welcome.png - Revision history

Maintenance script: Maintenance script uploaded File:Edg msexchange config welcome.png

2025-09-18T14:38:35Z

Maintenance script uploaded File:Edg msexchange config welcome.png

← Older revision	Revision as of 14:38, 18 September 2025
(No difference)

imported_>andre: Protected "Image:Edg msexchange config welcome.png" [edit=autoconfirmed:move=autoconfirmed]

2012-06-16T20:27:38Z

Protected "Image:Edg msexchange config welcome.png" [edit=autoconfirmed:move=autoconfirmed]

← Older revision	Revision as of 20:27, 16 June 2012
(No difference)

imported_>sixwheeledbeast: Undo revision 48469 by 70.99.206.242 (Talk)

2012-06-16T11:15:02Z

Undo revision 48469 by 70.99.206.242 (Talk)

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:15, 16 June 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Some pretty good inshigt here, Ari. Did you see that link to that other handheld terminal? The GUI you see on that terminal is not from any application running on the terminal but from a group of otherwise unrelated applications running in various places on the net. The X terminal's GUI only provides to the user a perception that what all these apps on all these computers is managed by the GUI. The GUI itself can even generate its own applications and GUI extensions to provide access to integrated services (what used to be called software). It's the combination of the GUI as an access method to the otherwise unrelated software services and the mobile X terminal that is the magic. There's no QT, no GTK, no Java, no RDP, no Citrix, no VNC, no bitmaps.. There's just network transparent X.There is so much opportunity here and I'm trying to help you see a part of it that I doubt you can yet see because people typically don't understand applications, GUIs and software services in this new context very well, in spite of all the things that they do understand. When they see it they do recognize that it's the way the future will unfold, however.According to Microsoft has accepted the inevitability that graphics have to be done the way X does them. That's one of the biggest news stories of the past twenty years because it is an admission that they've been doing graphics in a way all along that will never allow for rendered graphics the way X does.The connection between these two paragraphs is that if you want to, you can be the biggest software services company on the planet. The opportunity is there for Nokia. Microsoft has admitted its pants have fallen down to its ankles. The remote X GUI and the will to exploit this is all you need. You're doing almost everything right. Put the key in the ignition and turn on the engine, why don't you?		[[Category:Enterprise]]

70.99.206.242: nYEzobXndNdFFWkEusq

2012-06-16T08:52:21Z

nYEzobXndNdFFWkEusq

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:52, 16 June 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~[[Category:Enterprise]]~~		Some pretty good inshigt here, Ari. Did you see that link to that other handheld terminal? The GUI you see on that terminal is not from any application running on the terminal but from a group of otherwise unrelated applications running in various places on the net. The X terminal's GUI only provides to the user a perception that what all these apps on all these computers is managed by the GUI. The GUI itself can even generate its own applications and GUI extensions to provide access to integrated services (what used to be called software). It's the combination of the GUI as an access method to the otherwise unrelated software services and the mobile X terminal that is the magic. There's no QT, no GTK, no Java, no RDP, no Citrix, no VNC, no bitmaps.. There's just network transparent X.There is so much opportunity here and I'm trying to help you see a part of it that I doubt you can yet see because people typically don't understand applications, GUIs and software services in this new context very well, in spite of all the things that they do understand. When they see it they do recognize that it's the way the future will unfold, however.According to Microsoft has accepted the inevitability that graphics have to be done the way X does them. That's one of the biggest news stories of the past twenty years because it is an admission that they've been doing graphics in a way all along that will never allow for rendered graphics the way X does.The connection between these two paragraphs is that if you want to, you can be the biggest software services company on the planet. The opportunity is there for Nokia. Microsoft has admitted its pants have fallen down to its ankles. The remote X GUI and the will to exploit this is all you need. You're doing almost everything right. Put the key in the ignition and turn on the engine, why don't you?

imported_>amigadave: categorise

2011-06-03T11:27:57Z

categorise

← Older revision	Revision as of 11:27, 3 June 2011
Line 1:	Line 1:
		[[Category:Enterprise]]

imported_>jpalko at 12:12, 27 May 2010

2010-05-27T12:12:40Z

New page